[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17097740#comment-17097740
 ] 

Hive QA commented on HIVE-23215:
--------------------------------



Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13001802/HIVE-23215.02.patch

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} +1 due to 1 test(s) being added or modified.

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} +1 due to 17194 tests passed

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/22064/testReport
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/22064/console
Test logs: http://104.198.109.242/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-22064/

Messages:
{noformat}
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.TestCheckPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.PrepPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.YetusPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ExecutionPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ReportingPhase
{noformat}

This message is automatically generated.

ATTACHMENT ID: 13001802 - PreCommit-HIVE-Build

> Make FilterContext and MutableFilterContext interfaces
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-23215
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23215
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: storage-api
>            Reporter: Owen O'Malley
>            Assignee: Owen O'Malley
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: HIVE-23215.01.patch, HIVE-23215.02.patch, 
> HIVE-23215.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> HIVE-22959 introduced FilterContext to support ORC-577. The duplication of 
> fields between the FilterContext and VectorizedRowBatch seems likely to cause 
> user confusion. This patch makes them interfaces that VectorizedRowBatch 
> implements.
> Thus, there is a single copy of the data and no need to copy them back and 
> forth. LLAP can make its own implementation of the interfaces if it doesn't 
> want to use VectorizedRowBatch.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to