marvinlanhenke commented on PR #324: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/324#issuecomment-2085319907
I've addressed those issues raised by @Xuanwo - thanks for the review. I think we can merge this PR for now - and continue working on #357; especially the caching issues; and proper integration testing with data. @Fokko @liurenjie1024 I haven't checked now, but from memory I believe py-iceberg uses pyspark to setup tables with actual data for proper integration testing? Would this make sense to tackle such an issue in the next weeks in order to provide proper integration testing? Or should we wait once #349 lands and we have a dedicated crate for e2e testing? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org