marvinlanhenke commented on PR #324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/324#issuecomment-2085319907

   I've addressed those issues raised by @Xuanwo - thanks for the review.
   
   I think we can merge this PR for now - and continue working on #357; 
   especially the caching issues; and proper integration testing with data.
   
   @Fokko @liurenjie1024 
   I haven't checked now, but from memory I believe py-iceberg uses pyspark to 
setup tables with actual data for proper integration testing? Would this make 
sense to tackle such an issue in the next weeks in order to provide proper 
integration testing? Or should we wait once #349 lands and we have a dedicated 
crate for e2e testing?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to