lukeFalsina commented on PR #3724: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/3724#issuecomment-5315035687
@singhpk234 Yes — initially in my testing I was setting the catalog-wide `scan-planning-mode=server` from the PyIceberg client. What you proposed makes more sense, so I've updated the PR to support it: the `loadTable` config override takes precedence over the catalog-level setting. I also re-tested with the catalog-wide property unset and only the per-table `loadTable` configs. That is much simpler from a user perspective, and it worked well in a single script that read both a policy-protected and an unprotected table from the same catalog — I verified the client used the plan choice returned by the server correctly for both table types. Details are in https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/3724#discussion_r3786311499 and the latest commit on this PR. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
