[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17130725#comment-17130725
 ] 

Ivan Daschinskiy commented on IGNITE-12808:
-------------------------------------------

[~amashenkov] Your scenario is obviously for pesistence cache? Am I correct? 
>>> I found it is possible to add query entity with non-default query 
>>> parallelism, but I see no tests for this.
Is it ok only to check configuration? Or you suggests to ensure exact number of 
threads?



> Allow create tables for existing caches
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-12808
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12808
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: sql
>            Reporter: Mikhail Cherkasov
>            Assignee: Ivan Daschinskiy
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> If you have a big cache with a lot of data and you need to index it, right 
> now you have to destroy cache and create a new one to index your data.  Or 
> create a new cache with a table and reload it to  data to the new cache which 
> definitely is time-consuming and super inconvenient.
> I believe we can allow users to create tables for existing caches.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to