issues  

Messages by Thread

• Re: [I] Move long[] group varint to backward-codecs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Apple filter before scoring in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Apple filter before scoring in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Fix Operations.reverse() to not add nondetermistic dead states [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix Operations.reverse() to not add nondetermistic dead states [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix Operations.reverse() to not add nondetermistic dead states [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Move anonymous Weight implementation in PointRangeQuery to named class [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add docIDRunEnd contract tests for DV formats [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Delegate docIDRunEnd in AssertingScorer's two-phase iterator [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add bulk-scorer differential oracle test [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] tests fail due to large amount of output with highish tests.iters [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] tests fail due to large amount of output with highish tests.iters [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Lucene KNN token vectors demo [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement intoBitSet for NotDocIdSet and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Assert matching clause in testExplainFailingOptionalClauses [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix errors in grouping package-info javadocs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix errors in grouping package-info javadocs [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Avoid per-document int[] allocation in BytesRefHash#shrink() for term vectors path [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] BytesRefHash can be simplified (and made faster) [LUCENE-5854] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Can we optimize BytesRefHash? [LUCENE-10572] [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Can we optimize BytesRefHash? [LUCENE-10572] [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Can we optimize BytesRefHash? [LUCENE-10572] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Error during group search in multithreaded mode [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Error during group search in multithreaded mode [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add a scalar-quantized version of the de-duplicating vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a scalar-quantized version of the de-duplicating vector format [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 5.0.7 to 5.0.8 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.ben-manes.versions from 0.58.0 to 0.60.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump commons-codec:commons-codec from 1.22.0 to 1.22.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump nl.littlerobots.version-catalog-update from 1.1.0 to 1.1.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin from 2.7.0 to 2.8.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ByteBuffersDataInput: bound random-access reads by limit, not capacity [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Clean up BytesRefHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up BytesRefHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up BytesRefHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up BytesRefHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up BytesRefHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up BytesRefHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up BytesRefHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up BytesRefHash [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove JVMCI checks and update assertions for Java 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove JVMCI checks and update assertions for Java 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove JVMCI checks and update assertions for Java 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove JVMCI checks and update assertions for Java 25 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Allow Java vector incubator API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow Java Panama vector API on GraalVM for JDK 25+ (#16317) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Should we use the new `expectedVisitedNodes` estimator to speed up filtered vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use the new `expectedVisitedNodes` estimator to speed up filtered vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] LUCENE-10099: Add -Ptests.asyncprofile option. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and add partitionBy… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and add partitionBy… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and add partitionBy… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and add partitionBy… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and add partitionBy… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and add partitionBy… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and add partitionBy… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and add partitionBy… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and add partitionBy… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and add partitionBy… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and add partitionBy… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and add partitionBy… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and track input ordinals for scatter/gather [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and track input ordinals for scatter/gather [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign ReaderUtil.partitionByLeaf to take int[] and track input ordinals for scatter/gather [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Support optional pre-building QueryCache for newly generated segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support optional pre-building QueryCache for newly generated segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support optional pre-building QueryCache for newly generated segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support optional pre-building QueryCache for newly generated segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support optional pre-building QueryCache for newly generated segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support optional pre-building QueryCache for newly generated segments [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport "sandboxed de-duplicating HNSW vector format" to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport "sandboxed de-duplicating HNSW vector format" to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Optimizing use the QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [Backport PR] Wrap dropped-FP scalar-quantized float values so scoring stays quantized [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport PR] Wrap dropped-FP scalar-quantized float values so scoring stays quantized [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] [Backport PR] Wrap dropped-FP scalar-quantized float values so scoring stays quantized [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport PR] Wrap dropped-FP scalar-quantized float values so scoring stays quantized [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix stale block size comments in Lucene104 postings reader/writer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Pattern replace keywords [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.eclipse.jgit:org.eclipse.jgit from 7.7.0.202606012155-r to 7.7.1.202607240634-r [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.eclipse.jgit:org.eclipse.jgit from 7.7.0.202606012155-r to 7.7.1.202607240634-r [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.diffplug.spotless from 8.8.0 to 8.9.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.diffplug.spotless from 8.8.0 to 8.9.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.luben:zstd-jni from 1.5.7-11 to 1.5.7-12 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.luben:zstd-jni from 1.5.7-11 to 1.5.7-12 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.ben-manes.versions from 0.54.0 to 0.58.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.ben-manes.versions from 0.54.0 to 0.58.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] LUCENE-6513: Add FrequentTermsSpanBooleanQueryRewrite [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-6513: Add FrequentTermsSpanBooleanQueryRewrite [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Custom GradleWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom GradleWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom GradleWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom GradleWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom GradleWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom GradleWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom GradleWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom GradleWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Modernize SnapshotDeletionPolicy and PersistentSnapshotDeletionPolicy [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport #14977 to branch_10x: invoke KnnVectorsReader#finishMerge() from SegmentMerger#cleanupMerge() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs (#14977) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs (#14977) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs (#14977) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs (#14977) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs (#14977) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs (#14977) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs (#14977) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] GITHUB#16479: verify a CRC32C of each stored-fields and term-vectors chunk before decompressing it [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Stored fields and term vectors do not detect a corrupt chunk on the read path [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Stored fields and term vectors do not detect a corrupt chunk on the read path [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reject LZ4 match offsets that point before the start of the output [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Remove checkindex -exorcise [LUCENE-6344] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] CheckIndex.checkIndex throws IndexNotFoundException: no segments* file found in RAMDirectory@ [LUCENE-6765] [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] [ENH] Opt-In Roaring Bitmap Indexing for High-Cardinality Multi-Valued Aggregations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [ENH] Opt-In Roaring Bitmap Indexing for High-Cardinality Multi-Valued Aggregations [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] CheckIndex: pre-exorcise document id salvage [LUCENE-8961] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] rethink TestCheckIndex.testLuceneConstantVersion [LUCENE-4435] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Throw CorruptSegmentInfoException on encountering missing segment info (_N.si) file in CheckIndex [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] GITHUB#7820: report which segment's .si could not be read [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#7820: report which segment's .si could not be read [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#7820: report which segment's .si could not be read [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#7820: report which segment's .si could not be read [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#7820: report which segment's .si could not be read [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Remove Fields Order Checks from CheckIndex? [LUCENE-8924] [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] GITHUB#9967: document the Fields#iterator() order contract and assert it in tests [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] CheckIndex cannot "fix" indexes that have individual segments with missing or corrupt .si files because sanity checks will fail trying to read the index initially. [LUCENE-6762] [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] GITHUB#7820: refuse to exorcise an index whose commit point could not be read [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add scalar quantization support to Fp16 vector encoding [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Binary search all terms. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.4.0 to 5.6.0 in /.github/actions/prepare-for-build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.4.0 to 5.6.0 in /.github/actions/prepare-for-build [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-go from 6.5.0 to 7.0.0 in /.github/actions/eclint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-go from 6.5.0 to 7.0.0 in /.github/actions/eclint [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump astral-sh/setup-uv from 8.2.0 to 9.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump astral-sh/setup-uv from 8.2.0 to 9.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action/upload-sarif from 4.36.2 to 4.37.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action/upload-sarif from 4.36.2 to 4.37.3 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/labeler from 6.1.0 to 7.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/labeler from 6.1.0 to 7.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.3 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.3 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/checkout from 7.0.0 to 7.0.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/checkout from 7.0.0 to 7.0.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ast-grep-cli from 0.44.0 to 0.45.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ast-grep-cli from 0.44.0 to 0.45.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ast-grep-cli from 0.44.0 to 0.45.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ast-grep-cli from 0.44.0 to 0.45.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ast-grep-cli from 0.44.0 to 0.45.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-python from 6.3.0 to 7.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-python from 6.3.0 to 7.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.4.0 to 5.6.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.4.0 to 5.6.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump prek from 0.4.5 to 0.4.11 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump prek from 0.4.5 to 0.4.11 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump types-pyyaml from 6.0.12.20260518 to 6.0.12.20260724 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump types-pyyaml from 6.0.12.20260518 to 6.0.12.20260724 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump types-pyyaml from 6.0.12.20260518 to 6.0.12.20260724 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ty from 0.0.53 to 0.0.63 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ty from 0.0.53 to 0.0.63 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump rumdl from 0.2.22 to 0.2.43 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump rumdl from 0.2.22 to 0.2.43 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump rumdl from 0.2.22 to 0.2.43 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump typos from 1.47.2 to 1.48.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump typos from 1.47.2 to 1.48.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump zizmor from 1.26.1 to 1.28.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump zizmor from 1.26.1 to 1.28.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.15.19 to 0.16.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.15.19 to 0.16.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.15.19 to 0.16.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.15.19 to 0.16.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.99 to 0.101 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.99 to 0.101 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.99 to 0.101 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/stale from 10.3.0 to 10.4.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/stale from 10.3.0 to 10.4.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix over-allocation of result bitset in MemoryAccountingBitsetCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix over-allocation of result bitset in MemoryAccountingBitsetCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix over-allocation of result bitset in MemoryAccountingBitsetCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages