issues  

Messages by Thread

• [PR] Document batch collection score contract [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Document batch collection score contract [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Document batch collection score contract [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Document batch collection score contract [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Document batch collection score contract [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Tighten constant-score bulk routing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tighten constant-score bulk routing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tighten constant-score bulk routing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tighten constant-score bulk routing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tighten constant-score bulk routing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tighten constant-score bulk routing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tighten constant-score bulk routing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tighten constant-score bulk routing [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize disjunction docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize disjunction docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize disjunction docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize disjunction docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize disjunction docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DefaultBulkScorer for ConstantScoreScorer via intoBitSet batching [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix --tests filtering with -Dtests.iters for JUnit4 tests [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix --tests filtering with -Dtests.iters for JUnit4 tests [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix --tests filtering with -Dtests.iters for JUnit4 tests [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix --tests filtering with -Dtests.iters for JUnit4 tests [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix --tests filtering with -Dtests.iters for JUnit4 tests [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix --tests filtering with -Dtests.iters for JUnit4 tests [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix IBSimilarity with DistributionSPL producing negative scores [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reject non-SerializableObject classes in SerializableObject.readClass [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] IBSimilarity causes test failure in TestSynonymQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IBSimilarity causes test failure in TestSynonymQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IBSimilarity causes test failure in TestSynonymQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IBSimilarity causes test failure in TestSynonymQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IBSimilarity causes test failure in TestSynonymQuery [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [Backport 10x] Add bulk decode for dense NumericDocValues via longValues() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Add bulk decode for dense NumericDocValues via longValues() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Add bulk decode for dense NumericDocValues via longValues() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Add bulk decode for dense NumericDocValues via longValues() [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] disable external entities in hyphenation PatternParser [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] disable external entities in hyphenation PatternParser [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] disable external entities in hyphenation PatternParser [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] disable external entities in hyphenation PatternParser [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] disable external entities in hyphenation PatternParser [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] disable external entities in hyphenation PatternParser [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] disable external entities in hyphenation PatternParser [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable external entities in hyphenation PatternParser [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable external entities in hyphenation PatternParser [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Wildcard.toAutomaton consumes an excessive amount with repeated asterisks. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wildcard.toAutomaton consumes an excessive amount with repeated asterisks. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wildcard.toAutomaton consumes an excessive amount with repeated asterisks. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wildcard.toAutomaton consumes an excessive amount with repeated asterisks. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wildcard.toAutomaton consumes an excessive amount with repeated asterisks. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] FilterLeafCollector should delegate competitiveIterator() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FilterLeafCollector should delegate competitiveIterator() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FilterLeafCollector should delegate competitiveIterator() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FilterLeafCollector should delegate competitiveIterator() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FilterLeafCollector should delegate competitiveIterator() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FilterLeafCollector should delegate competitiveIterator() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FilterLeafCollector should delegate competitiveIterator() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FilterLeafCollector should delegate competitiveIterator() [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.diffplug.spotless from 8.4.0 to 8.5.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.diffplug.spotless from 8.4.0 to 8.5.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump junit5 from 6.0.3 to 6.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump junit5 from 6.0.3 to 6.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump junit5 from 6.0.3 to 6.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump junit5 from 6.0.3 to 6.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump junit5 from 6.0.3 to 6.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Stabilize column batch tests under randomized IWC [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Stabilize column batch tests under randomized IWC [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Stabilize column batch tests under randomized IWC [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Stabilize column batch tests under randomized IWC [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Stabilize column batch tests under randomized IWC [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add bulk decode for dense NumericDocValues via longValues() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk decode for dense NumericDocValues via longValues() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk decode for dense NumericDocValues via longValues() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk decode for dense NumericDocValues via longValues() [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Feat: Add auto formatting bot [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Promote PerThreadPKLookup to core as PrimaryKeyLookup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Promote PerThreadPKLookup to core as PrimaryKeyLookup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Promote PerThreadPKLookup to core as PrimaryKeyLookup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Promote PerThreadPKLookup to core as PrimaryKeyLookup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Promote PerThreadPKLookup to core as PrimaryKeyLookup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Promote PerThreadPKLookup to core as PrimaryKeyLookup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Promote PerThreadPKLookup to core as PrimaryKeyLookup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Promote PerThreadPKLookup to core as PrimaryKeyLookup [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestTermInSetQuery.testDuel failure in branch 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestTermInSetQuery.testDuel failure in branch 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestTermInSetQuery.testDuel failure in branch 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement #intoBitSet and #docIDRunEnd in DocValuesWriter implementations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #intoBitSet and #docIDRunEnd in DocValuesWriter implementations [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement AssertingLeafReader#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement AssertingLeafReader#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Security research validation: benign auto format workflow test [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] PanamaDocValuesRangeSupport: OR mask directly into FixedBitSet instead of per-bit loop [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PanamaDocValuesRangeSupport: OR mask directly into FixedBitSet instead of per-bit loop [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PanamaDocValuesRangeSupport: OR mask directly into FixedBitSet instead of per-bit loop [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PanamaDocValuesRangeSupport: OR mask directly into FixedBitSet instead of per-bit loop [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PanamaDocValuesRangeSupport: OR mask directly into FixedBitSet instead of per-bit loop [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PanamaDocValuesRangeSupport: OR mask directly into FixedBitSet instead of per-bit loop [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PanamaDocValuesRangeSupport: OR mask directly into FixedBitSet instead of per-bit loop [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] FacetCutter: unify rollup and range remapping [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot use `-Dtests.iters` on specific test any more [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Simplifiy SortedSkipperScorerSupplier [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplifiy SortedSkipperScorerSupplier [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize byte array writes in OutputStreamIndexOutput to remove unnecessary overhead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize byte array writes in OutputStreamIndexOutput to remove unnecessary overhead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize byte array writes in OutputStreamIndexOutput to remove unnecessary overhead [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove getOrAddPerField calls in processBatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove getOrAddPerField calls in processBatch [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] add updateDocuments(Term, ColumnBatch) to IndexWriter for atomic delete-and-add columnar operations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add updateDocuments(Term, ColumnBatch) to IndexWriter for atomic delete-and-add columnar operations [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Invert eligible BinaryColumns in the column pass [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reject duplicate column names in ColumnBatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reject duplicate column names in ColumnBatch [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] docs(util): clarify `Accountable.ramBytesUsed()` ownership semantics [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] feat(util): clarify Accountable ownership semantics and fix inconsistent ramBytesUsed() accounting [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] feat(util): clarify `Accountable` ownership semantics and fix inconsistent `ramBytesUsed()` [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] stop all slices once any slice hits timeout in concurrent search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] stop all slices once any slice hits timeout in concurrent search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] stop all slices once any slice hits timeout in concurrent search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] stop all slices once any slice hits timeout in concurrent search [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize FieldExistsQuery.count() when all docs have the field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize FieldExistsQuery.count() when all docs have the field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize FieldExistsQuery.count() when all docs have the field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize FieldExistsQuery.count() when all docs have the field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize FieldExistsQuery.count() when all docs have the field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize FieldExistsQuery.count() when all docs have the field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize FieldExistsQuery.count() when all docs have the field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize FieldExistsQuery.count() when all docs have the field [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages