[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16953974#comment-16953974
]
David Wayne Smiley commented on SOLR-12490:
-------------------------------------------
I have not used the Query DSL so I'm not of much help. But I couldn't help but
think maybe the _tag_ should be specified using a {{tag:color}} within the JSON
somewhere so that it's more consistent with the existing local-param based
query tagging that's been in Solr for a long time? It doesn't have to but it's
just a consideration. If we don't, I do like your use of the # pound sign
which is kinda consistent with HTML id references.
> Query DSL supports for further referring and exclusion in JSON facets
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12490
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12490
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Facet Module, faceting
> Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
> Priority: Major
> Labels: newdev
> Attachments: SOLR-12490.patch
>
>
> It's spin off from the
> [discussion|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9685?focusedCommentId=16508720&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16508720].
>
> h2. Problem
> # after SOLR-9685 we can tag separate clauses in hairish queries like
> {{parent}}, {{bool}}
> # we can {{domain.excludeTags}}
> # we are looking for child faceting with exclusions, see SOLR-9510, SOLR-8998
>
> # but we can refer only separate params in {{domain.filter}}, it's not
> possible to refer separate clauses
> see the first comment
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
