issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Introduce intoCacheAndCount method to BulkScorer to allow cache specializations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce intoCacheAndCount method to BulkScorer to allow cache specializations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce intoCacheAndCount method to BulkScorer to allow cache specializations [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] DiversifyingChildren benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement LeafCollector#collectRange in the collectors used in LRUCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement LeafCollector#collectRange in the collectors used in LRUCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement LeafCollector#collectRange in the collectors used in LRUCache [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add a BulkScorer for queries that match a dense range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a BulkScorer for queries that match a dense range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a BulkScorer for queries that match a dense range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a BulkScorer for queries that match a dense range [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] add FixedBitSet.nextUnsetBit and use it in MergingHnswGraphBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add FixedBitSet.nextUnsetBit and use it in MergingHnswGraphBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add FixedBitSet.nextUnsetBit and use it in MergingHnswGraphBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add FixedBitSet.nextUnsetBit and use it in MergingHnswGraphBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollector not handling requested hit count correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollector not handling requested hit count correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollector not handling requested hit count correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollector not handling requested hit count correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollector not handling requested hit count correctly [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement #docIdRunEnd in the iterators used by RoaringDocIdSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #docIdRunEnd in the iterators used by RoaringDocIdSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #docIdRunEnd in the iterators used by RoaringDocIdSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #docIdRunEnd in the iterators used by RoaringDocIdSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #docIdRunEnd in the iterators used by RoaringDocIdSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #docIdRunEnd in the iterators used by RoaringDocIdSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #docIdRunEnd in the iterators used by RoaringDocIdSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #docIdRunEnd in the iterators used by RoaringDocIdSet [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Adding 3-ary PriorityQueue to speed up TopFieldCollector [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix flaky tests in TestColumnBatchIndexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix flaky tests in TestColumnBatchIndexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix flaky tests in TestColumnBatchIndexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix flaky tests in TestColumnBatchIndexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix flaky tests in TestColumnBatchIndexing [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Ban presized collection#toArray [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ban presized collection#toArray [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [INFRA] Set up default rulesets for default and release branches [lucene-solr] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [INFRA] Set up default rulesets for default and release branches [lucene-solr] via GitHub
• [PR] [INFRA] Set up default rulesets for default and release branches [lucene-jira-archive] via GitHub
• [PR] Simplify SortedDocIDMerger.next() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplify SortedDocIDMerger.next() [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement BitSetIterator#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement BitSetIterator#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement BitSetIterator#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement BitSetIterator#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Can we improve caching of dense results? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Can we improve caching of dense results? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Can we improve caching of dense results? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Follow up #16061. Tighten score supplier cost estimation and introduce SortedSkipperScorerSupplier [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Follow up #16061. Tighten score supplier cost estimation and introduce SortedSkipperScorerSupplier [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Follow up #16061. Tighten score supplier cost estimation and introduce SortedSkipperScorerSupplier [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Follow up #16061. Tighten score supplier cost estimation and introduce SortedSkipperScorerSupplier [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Follow up #16061. Tighten score supplier cost estimation and introduce SortedSkipperScorerSupplier [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Follow up #16061. Tighten score supplier cost estimation and introduce SortedSkipperScorerSupplier [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Increase the number of dims for KNN vectors to 2048 [LUCENE-10471] [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove redundant final modifiers. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove redundant final modifiers [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add FlatFieldVectorsWriter#asKnnVectorValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add FlatFieldVectorsWriter#asKnnVectorValues [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getSumDocFreq and LeafReader#getSumTotalTermFreq signatures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getSumDocFreq and LeafReader#getSumTotalTermFreq signatures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getSumDocFreq and LeafReader#getSumTotalTermFreq signatures [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getDocCount signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getDocCount signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getDocCount signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getDocCount signature [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#terms signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#terms signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#terms signature [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getPointValues signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getPointValues signature [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Modernize collection#to array calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Modernize collection#toArray calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Modernize collection#toArray calls [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.luben:zstd-jni from 1.5.7-7 to 1.5.7-8 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.luben:zstd-jni from 1.5.7-7 to 1.5.7-8 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 5.0.5 to 5.0.6 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 5.0.5 to 5.0.6 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add an (optional) field-writer creation strategy to `Lucene99FlatVectorsWriter` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an (optional) field-writer creation strategy to `Lucene99FlatVectorsWriter` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an (optional) field-writer creation strategy to `Lucene99FlatVectorsWriter` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an (optional) field-writer creation strategy to `Lucene99FlatVectorsWriter` [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Remove declared IOException in LeafReader methods that should not be doing I/O [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove declared IOException in LeafReader methods that should not be doing I/O [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add ArrayTermInSetQuery to sandbox/ along with a JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ArrayTermInSetQuery to sandbox/ along with a JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ArrayTermInSetQuery to sandbox/ along with a JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ArrayTermInSetQuery to sandbox/ along with a JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages