[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17009454#comment-17009454
 ] 

Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-9080:
-------------------------------------

We lost some of the generics in that patch; I assume these are generated by 
javacc? 

> Upgrade ICU4j to 62.2 and regenerate
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9080
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9080
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: after_regen.patch, before_regen.patch, status.res
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The root cause is that RamUsageEstimator.NUM_BYTES_INT has been removed and 
> the python scripts still reference it in the generated scripts. That part's 
> easy to fix.
> Last time I looked, though, the regenerate produces some differences in the 
> generated files that should be looked at to insure they're benign.
> Not really sure whether this should be a Lucene or Solr JIRA. Putting it in 
> Lucene since one of the failed files is: 
> lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/packed/Packed8ThreeBlocks.java
> I do know that one of the Solr jflex-produced file has an unexplained 
> difference so it may bleed over.
> "ant regenerate" needs about 24G on my machine FWIW.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to