[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17060378#comment-17060378
]
Richard Goodman commented on SOLR-14325:
----------------------------------------
Hi [~dsmiley], many thanks for your reply to my email. I've been spending all
day looking at this, and have got something that used a directoryReader instead
and looked like it worked fine when running a local techproducts instance.
I'll be testing tomorrow on my dev cluster which will replicate the issue we
get in our live environment, and let you know my findings, and if successful,
I'll submit a patch for review :)
> Core status could be improved to not require an IndexSearcher
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-14325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14325
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Priority: Major
>
> When the core status is told to request "indexInfo", it currently grabs the
> SolrIndexSearcher but only to grab the Directory. SolrCore.getIndexSize also
> only requires the Directory. By insisting on a SolrIndexSearcher, we
> potentially block for awhile if the core is in recovery since there is no
> SolrIndexSearcher.
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r076218c964e9bd6ed0a53133be9170c3cf36cc874c1b4652120db417%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E]
> It'd be nice to have a solution that conditionally used the Directory of the
> SolrIndexSearcher only if it's present so that we don't waste time creating
> one either.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
