[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Anshum Gupta updated SOLR-14265:
--------------------------------
    Summary: Move collections admin API to v2 completely   (was: Move to admin 
API to v2 completely )

> Move collections admin API to v2 completely 
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-14265
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14265
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Anshum Gupta
>            Assignee: Anshum Gupta
>            Priority: Major
>
> V2 admin API has been available in Solr for a very long time, making it 
> difficult for both users and developers to remember and understand which 
> format to use when. We should move to v2 API completely for all Solr Admin 
> calls for the following reasons:
>  # converge code - there are multiple ways of doing the same thing, there's 
> unwanted back-compat code, and we should get rid of that
>  # POJO all the way - no more NamedList. I know this would have split 
> opinions, but I strongly think we should move in this direction. I created 
> Jira about this specific task in the past and went half way but I think we 
> should just close this one out now.
>  # Automatic documentation
>  # Others
> This is just an umbrella Jira for the task. Let's create sub-tasks and split 
> this up as it would require a bunch of rewriting of the code and it makes a 
> lot of sense to get this out with 9.0 so we don't have to support v1 forever! 
> There have been some conversations going on about this and it feels like most 
> folks are happy to go this route.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to