[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17090721#comment-17090721
 ] 

Mike Drob commented on SOLR-14428:
----------------------------------

If there are no terms in the index, then the fuzzy query should be collapsing 
pretty quickly and there would be no reason for it to take up so much memory. 
Do we only do that at query processing time now? I thought we would be doing 
that as aggressively as possible.

> FuzzyQuery has severe memory usage in 8.5
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-14428
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14428
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>    Affects Versions: 8.5, 8.5.1
>            Reporter: Colvin Cowie
>            Assignee: Andrzej Bialecki
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: FuzzyHammer.java, image-2020-04-23-09-18-06-070.png, 
> screenshot-2.png, screenshot-3.png, screenshot-4.png
>
>
> I sent this to the mailing list
> I'm moving from 8.3.1 to 8.5.1, and started getting Out Of Memory Errors 
> while running our normal tests. After profiling it was clear that the 
> majority of the heap was allocated through FuzzyQuery.
> LUCENE-9068 moved construction of the automata from the FuzzyTermsEnum to the 
> FuzzyQuery's constructor.
> I created a little test ( [^FuzzyHammer.java] ) that fires off fuzzy queries 
> from random UUID strings for 5 minutes
> {code}
> FIELD_NAME + ":" + UUID.randomUUID().toString().replace("-", "") + "~2"
> {code}
> When running against a vanilla Solr 8.31 and 8.4.1 there is no problem, while 
> the memory usage has increased drastically on 8.5.0 and 8.5.1.
> Comparison of heap usage while running the attached test against Solr 8.3.1 
> and 8.5.1 with a single (empty) shard and 4GB heap:
> !image-2020-04-23-09-18-06-070.png! 
> And with 4 shards on 8.4.1 and 8.5.0:
>  !screenshot-2.png! 
> I'm guessing that the memory might be being leaked if the FuzzyQuery objects 
> are referenced from the cache, while the FuzzyTermsEnum would not have been.
> Query Result Cache on 8.5.1:
>  !screenshot-3.png! 
> ~316mb in the cache
> QRC on 8.3.1
>  !screenshot-4.png! 
> <1mb
> With an empty cache, running this query 
> _field_s:e41848af85d24ac197c71db6888e17bc~2_ results in the following memory 
> allocation
> {noformat}
> 8.3.1: CACHE.searcher.queryResultCache.ramBytesUsed:      1520
> 8.5.1: CACHE.searcher.queryResultCache.ramBytesUsed:    648855
> {noformat}
> ~1 gives 98253 and ~0 gives 6339 on 8.5.1. 8.3.1 is constant at 1520



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to