[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17097399#comment-17097399
]
Michael Sokolov commented on SOLR-13289:
----------------------------------------
It seems to me what we want to convey is whether the count is exact, or an
approximation. Are there any other "relations" that can be returned here? I
think that's it, so if instead we were to use a boolean, then the naming could
be {isCountExact} (or {isCountApproximate}). I suppose to maintain the enum,
we could say something like {countExactitude} or {countApproximation} (or
hitCount or numFound prefix is fine too), but it's slightly more awkward.
> Support for BlockMax WAND
> -------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-13289
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Assignee: Tomas Eduardo Fernandez Lobbe
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-13289.patch, SOLR-13289.patch
>
> Time Spent: 1h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> LUCENE-8135 introduced BlockMax WAND as a major speed improvement. Need to
> expose this via Solr. When enabled, the numFound returned will not be exact.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
