issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Performance regression in BooleanQuery with multiple MUST_NOT clauses on interleaved posting lists [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance regression in BooleanQuery with multiple MUST_NOT clauses on interleaved posting lists [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance regression in BooleanQuery with multiple MUST_NOT clauses on interleaved posting lists [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance regression in BooleanQuery with multiple MUST_NOT clauses on interleaved posting lists [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance regression in BooleanQuery with multiple MUST_NOT clauses on interleaved posting lists [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance regression in BooleanQuery with multiple MUST_NOT clauses on interleaved posting lists [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Defer Sorter.DocMap packing until after flush [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Defer Sorter.DocMap packing until after flush [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Defer Sorter.DocMap packing until after flush [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove the scorer on FlatVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove the scorer on FlatVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Join post-HNSW block rescore for diversifying child KNN (POC) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Join post-HNSW block rescore for diversifying child KNN (POC) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Join post-HNSW block rescore for diversifying child KNN (POC) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Join post-HNSW block rescore for diversifying child KNN (POC) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Join post-HNSW block rescore for diversifying child KNN (POC) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Avoid double-counting Automaton in CompiledAutomaton.ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid double-counting Automaton in CompiledAutomaton.ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid double-counting Automaton in CompiledAutomaton.ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid double-counting Automaton in CompiledAutomaton.ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid double-counting Automaton in CompiledAutomaton.ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid double-counting Automaton in CompiledAutomaton.ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Optimize StoredFields merge strategy based on chunk deletion ratio [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TestPerFieldDocValuesFormat.testThreads2 fails with java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Specify the field name when getting the FlatVectorsScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Specify the field name when getting the FlatVectorsScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix sandbox workflow/ faiss [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix sandbox workflow/ faiss [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] faiss codec workflow failures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] faiss codec workflow failures [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Upgrade to Gradle 9.5.0 (corrected) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Gradle 9.5.0 (corrected) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Gradle 9.5.0 (corrected) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Revert "deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.4.1 to 9.5.0" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.4.1 to 9.5.0" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.4.1 to 9.5.0" [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump commons-codec:commons-codec from 1.21.0 to 1.22.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump commons-codec:commons-codec from 1.21.0 to 1.22.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools from 2.5.8 to 2.5.9 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools from 2.5.8 to 2.5.9 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.4.1 to 9.5.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.4.1 to 9.5.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup - siblings expansion [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Data Race in BlockingFloatHeap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Data Race in BlockingFloatHeap [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Accountable and expose Levenshtein automata RAM cost in FuzzyQuery [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] LUCENE-10086: Fix an AssertionError when KoreanTokenizer tries to backtrace from and to the same position [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] LUCENE-10059: Additional fix to handle n_best backtrace [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement data-blind scalar quantization [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement data-blind scalar quantization [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Data-blind scalar quantization [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Data-blind scalar quantization [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Data-blind scalar quantization [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Data-blind scalar quantization [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Data-blind scalar quantization [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Misc junit4 test cleanups [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Misc junit4 test cleanups [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add base class and infrastructure support for JUnit5/Jupiter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add base class and infrastructure support for JUnit5/Jupiter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add base class and infrastructure support for JUnit5/Jupiter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add base class and infrastructure support for JUnit5/Jupiter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/cache from 5.0.4 to 5.0.5 in /.github/actions/prepare-for-build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/cache from 5.0.4 to 5.0.5 in /.github/actions/prepare-for-build [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump gradle/actions from 6.0.1 to 6.1.0 in /.github/actions/prepare-for-build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump gradle/actions from 6.0.1 to 6.1.0 in /.github/actions/prepare-for-build [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/cache from 5.0.4 to 5.0.5 in /.github/actions/eclint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/cache from 5.0.4 to 5.0.5 in /.github/actions/eclint [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.15.7 to 0.15.12 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.15.7 to 0.15.12 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump actionlint-py from 1.7.11.24 to 1.7.12.24 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump actionlint-py from 1.7.11.24 to 1.7.12.24 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ics from 0.7.2 to 0.7.3 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ics from 0.7.2 to 0.7.3 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.38.4 to 1.39.3 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.38.4 to 1.39.3 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.38.4 to 1.39.3 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.38.4 to 1.39.3 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump pygithub from 2.9.0 to 2.9.1 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump pygithub from 2.9.0 to 2.9.1 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump pygithub from 2.9.0 to 2.9.1 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ast-grep-cli from 0.42.0 to 0.42.1 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ast-grep-cli from 0.42.0 to 0.42.1 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump conda-incubator/setup-miniconda from 3.3.0 to 4.0.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump conda-incubator/setup-miniconda from 3.3.0 to 4.0.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump astral-sh/setup-uv from 7.3.0 to 8.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump astral-sh/setup-uv from 7.3.0 to 8.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump zizmor from 1.23.1 to 1.24.1 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump zizmor from 1.23.1 to 1.24.1 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/upload-artifact from 7.0.0 to 7.0.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/upload-artifact from 7.0.0 to 7.0.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump rumdl from 0.1.60 to 0.1.81 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump rumdl from 0.1.60 to 0.1.81 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.93 to 0.95 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.93 to 0.95 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action from 4.32.4 to 4.35.2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action from 4.32.4 to 4.35.2 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump gradle/actions from 6.0.1 to 6.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump gradle/actions from 6.0.1 to 6.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump prek from 0.3.8 to 0.3.10 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump prek from 0.3.8 to 0.3.10 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump pygithub from 2.9.0 to 2.9.1 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump pygithub from 2.9.0 to 2.9.1 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ics from 0.7.2 to 0.7.3 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ics from 0.7.2 to 0.7.3 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ics from 0.7.2 to 0.7.3 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.15.7 to 0.15.12 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.15.7 to 0.15.12 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.15.7 to 0.15.12 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.38.4 to 1.39.3 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.38.4 to 1.39.3 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.38.4 to 1.39.3 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.38.4 to 1.39.3 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.93 to 0.95 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.93 to 0.95 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.93 to 0.95 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize QueryVisitor.EMPTY_VISITOR [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize QueryVisitor.EMPTY_VISITOR [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize QueryVisitor.EMPTY_VISITOR [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize QueryVisitor.EMPTY_VISITOR [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize QueryVisitor.EMPTY_VISITOR [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages