[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17146628#comment-17146628
]
Mike Drob commented on SOLR-10814:
----------------------------------
The other side is that all of the authentication plugins that support short
names should be setting them anyway, and then the decision to use them or not
really does fall back to the authz plugin?
> Solr RuleBasedAuthorization config doesn't work seamlessly with kerberos
> authentication
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10814
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10814
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 6.2
> Reporter: Hrishikesh Gadre
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-10814.patch
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Solr allows configuring roles to control user access to the system. This is
> accomplished through rule-based permission definitions which are assigned to
> users.
> The authorization framework in Solr passes the information about the request
> (to be authorized) using an instance of AuthorizationContext class. Currently
> the only way to extract authenticated user is via getUserPrincipal() method
> which returns an instance of java.security.Principal class. The
> RuleBasedAuthorizationPlugin implementation invokes getName() method on the
> Principal instance to fetch the list of associated roles.
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/2271e73e763b17f971731f6f69d6ffe46c40b944/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/security/RuleBasedAuthorizationPlugin.java#L156
> In case of basic authentication mechanism, the principal is the userName.
> Hence it works fine. But in case of kerberos authentication, the user
> principal also contains the RELM information e.g. instead of foo, it would
> return f...@example.com. This means if the user changes the authentication
> mechanism, he would also need to change the user-role mapping in
> authorization section to use f...@example.com instead of foo. This is not
> good from usability perspective.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
