[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Ilan Ginzburg updated SOLR-14620: --------------------------------- Description: In the Autoscaling framework, preferences are values to maximize or minimize when doing replica placement decisions and are used to guide the framework towards the optimal placement decision. The default cluster preferences are minimizing the number of cores on each node then maximizing the free disk space on each node. In order to evaluate a {{Preference}}, the corresponding parameter value for a node (for example number of cores or free disk space) must be known. Such parameters for a node (and their values) are stored in a {{Cell}} array in the {{Row}} object. Parameter names come from multiple sources (not 100% sure about the list below, hard to really trace legit values): * {{From Preference}} definitions: {{freedisk}}, {{cores}}, {{heapUsage}} and {{sysLoadAvg}} * {{From Policy}} definitions: {{withCollection}}, {{port}}, {{ip_1}}, {{ip_2}}, {{ip_3}}, {{ip_4}}, {{freedisk}}, {{nodeRole}}, {{cores}}, {{sysLoadAvg}}, {{heapUsage}}, {{host}}, {{node}}, {{nodeset}}, {{metrics:\*}} (\* meaning any string) * Possibly from other places... {{"cores"}} and {{"freedisk"}} are always added to the {{Cell}} array in {{Row}} (see {{Policy.DEFAULT_PARAMS_OF_INTEREST}}). The {{Cell}} array is *sorted* by natural ordering of the parameter names. This causes {{"cores"}} to be first and {{"freedisk"}} second, as you'll notice all other parameter names listed above are lexicographically greater than these two. When comparing rows in {{Preference.compare()}} (used for sorting them), the value of the {{Preference}} is obtained from the {{Cell}} with array index equal to the {{Preference}} index (starts at 0, in the order declared). This obviously only makes sense if the {{Cell}} array order is identical to {{Preference}} list order. {{Preferences}} therefore would have to be provided by increasing parameter name and no parameters should exist in the {{Cell}} array that are lexicographically smaller than the "highest" {{Preference}} without having a matching {{Preference}}. This basically means that when preferences are the default minimize number of cores first then maximize freedisk second, the check works. But if for example cluster preferences are explicitly defined to maximize freedisk first then minimize number of cores, the check is broken. This will be more apparent when parameters to maximize are swapped with parameters to minimize (which would be the case here). Unclear to me what's the real impact of this issue. was: In the Autoscaling framework, preferences are values to maximize or minimize when doing replica placement decisions and are used to guide the framework towards the optimal placement decision. The default cluster preferences are minimizing the number of cores on each node then maximizing the free disk space on each node. In order to evaluate a {{Preference}}, the corresponding parameter value for a node (for example number of cores or free disk space) must be known. Such parameters for a node (and their values) are stored in a {{Cell}} array in the {{Row}} object. Parameter names come from multiple sources (not 100% sure about the list below, hard to really trace legit values): * {{From Preference}} definitions: {{freedisk}}, {{cores}}, {{heapUsage}} and {{sysLoadAvg}} * {{From Policy}} definitions: {{withCollection}}, {{port}}, {{ip_1}}, {{ip_2}}, {{ip_3}}, {{ip_4}}, {{freedisk}}, {{nodeRole}}, {{cores}}, {{sysLoadAvg}}, {{heapUsage}}, {{host}}, {{node}}, {{nodeset}}, {{metrics:***}} ({{*}} meaning any string) * Possibly from other places... {{"cores"}} and {{"freedisk"}} are always added to the {{Cell}} array in {{Row}} (see {{Policy.DEFAULT_PARAMS_OF_INTEREST}}). The {{Cell}} array is *sorted* by natural ordering of the parameter names. This causes {{"cores"}} to be first and {{"freedisk"}} second, as you'll notice all other parameter names listed above are lexicographically greater than these two. When comparing rows in {{Preference.compare()}} (used for sorting them), the value of the {{Preference}} is obtained from the {{Cell}} with array index equal to the {{Preference}} index (starts at 0, in the order declared). This obviously only makes sense if the {{Cell}} array order is identical to {{Preference}} list order. {{Preferences}} therefore would have to be provided by increasing parameter name and no parameters should exist in the {{Cell}} array that are lexicographically smaller than the "highest" {{Preference}} without having a matching {{Preference}}. This basically means that when preferences are the default minimize number of cores first then maximize freedisk second, the check works. But if for example cluster preferences are explicitly defined to maximize freedisk first then minimize number of cores, the check is broken. This will be more apparent when parameters to maximize are swapped with parameters to minimize (which would be the case here). Unclear to me what's the real impact of this issue. > Preference checks in Autoscaling framework can go wrong > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-14620 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14620 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: AutoScaling, SolrCloud > Reporter: Ilan Ginzburg > Priority: Minor > Labels: autoscaling, preference, solrcloud > > In the Autoscaling framework, preferences are values to maximize or minimize > when doing replica placement decisions and are used to guide the framework > towards the optimal placement decision. The default cluster preferences are > minimizing the number of cores on each node then maximizing the free disk > space on each node. In order to evaluate a {{Preference}}, the corresponding > parameter value for a node (for example number of cores or free disk space) > must be known. > Such parameters for a node (and their values) are stored in a {{Cell}} array > in the {{Row}} object. Parameter names come from multiple sources (not 100% > sure about the list below, hard to really trace legit values): > * {{From Preference}} definitions: {{freedisk}}, {{cores}}, {{heapUsage}} > and {{sysLoadAvg}} > * {{From Policy}} definitions: {{withCollection}}, {{port}}, {{ip_1}}, > {{ip_2}}, {{ip_3}}, {{ip_4}}, {{freedisk}}, {{nodeRole}}, {{cores}}, > {{sysLoadAvg}}, {{heapUsage}}, {{host}}, {{node}}, {{nodeset}}, > {{metrics:\*}} (\* meaning any string) > * Possibly from other places... > {{"cores"}} and {{"freedisk"}} are always added to the {{Cell}} array in > {{Row}} (see {{Policy.DEFAULT_PARAMS_OF_INTEREST}}). The {{Cell}} array is > *sorted* by natural ordering of the parameter names. This causes {{"cores"}} > to be first and {{"freedisk"}} second, as you'll notice all other parameter > names listed above are lexicographically greater than these two. > When comparing rows in {{Preference.compare()}} (used for sorting them), the > value of the {{Preference}} is obtained from the {{Cell}} with array index > equal to the {{Preference}} index (starts at 0, in the order declared). > This obviously only makes sense if the {{Cell}} array order is identical to > {{Preference}} list order. {{Preferences}} therefore would have to be > provided by increasing parameter name and no parameters should exist in the > {{Cell}} array that are lexicographically smaller than the "highest" > {{Preference}} without having a matching {{Preference}}. > This basically means that when preferences are the default minimize number of > cores first then maximize freedisk second, the check works. But if for > example cluster preferences are explicitly defined to maximize freedisk first > then minimize number of cores, the check is broken. This will be more > apparent when parameters to maximize are swapped with parameters to minimize > (which would be the case here). > Unclear to me what's the real impact of this issue. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org