issues
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: [PR] Post-filter broad filters in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Post-filter broad filters in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Use filter doc ID runs in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Optimize IndexSearcher.count() to rewrite the query once [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Optimize IndexSearcher.count() to rewrite the query once [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Optimize IndexSearcher.count() to rewrite the query once [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Optimize IndexSearcher.count() to rewrite the query once [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Optimize IndexSearcher.count() to rewrite the query once [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Clarify intent of Accountable#ramBytesUsed [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Clarify intent of Accountable#ramBytesUsed [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Clarify intent of Accountable#ramBytesUsed [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Clarify intent of Accountable#ramBytesUsed [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Clarify intent of Accountable#ramBytesUsed [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Clarify intent of Accountable#ramBytesUsed [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Clarify intent of Accountable#ramBytesUsed [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Clarify intent of Accountable#ramBytesUsed [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Clarify intent of Accountable#ramBytesUsed [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Skip testing back-compat of unsupported DOCS_AND_CUSTOM_FREQS in 6.0 format [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Skip testing back-compat of unsupported DOCS_AND_CUSTOM_FREQS in 6.0 format [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Skip testing back-compat of unsupported DOCS_AND_CUSTOM_FREQS in 6.0 format [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Skipping scorer construction for clauses with zero cost [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Skipping scorer construction for clauses with zero cost [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Skipping scorer construction for clauses with zero cost [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Fix JFR profile summary skip check [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix JFR profile summary skip check [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix JFR profile summary skip check [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix JFR profile summary skip check [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix JFR profile summary skip check [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix JFR profile summary skip check [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix JFR profile summary skip check [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix JFR profile summary skip check [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix JFR profile summary skip check [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix JFR profile summary skip check [lucene]
via GitHub
[I] Document DocValuesSkipper [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Document DocValuesSkipper [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Document DocValuesSkipper [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Document DocValuesSkipper [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Document DocValuesSkipper [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Document DocValuesSkipper [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Document DocValuesSkipper [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Document DocValuesSkipper [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Fix TopGroupsCollectorManager ignoring withinGroupOffset [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix TopGroupsCollectorManager ignoring withinGroupOffset [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix TopGroupsCollectorManager ignoring withinGroupOffset [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix TopGroupsCollectorManager ignoring withinGroupOffset [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix TopGroupsCollectorManager ignoring withinGroupOffset [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix TopGroupsCollectorManager ignoring withinGroupOffset [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix TopGroupsCollectorManager ignoring withinGroupOffset [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix TopGroupsCollectorManager ignoring withinGroupOffset [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix TopGroupsCollectorManager ignoring withinGroupOffset [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix TopGroupsCollectorManager ignoring withinGroupOffset [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix TopGroupsCollectorManager ignoring withinGroupOffset [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] deps(java): bump com.github.ben-manes.versions from 0.53.0 to 0.54.0 [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.ben-manes.versions from 0.53.0 to 0.54.0 [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] [BACKPORT] Try using Murmurhash 3 for bloom filters (#12868) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] [BACKPORT] Try using Murmurhash 3 for bloom filters (#12868) [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Optimize DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer: reuse inner collector and inline score reset [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Optimize DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer: reuse inner collector and inline score reset [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Can we add configuration on dropping raw vectors from quantized formats after some period of time? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Can we add configuration on dropping raw vectors from quantized formats after some period of time? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Can we add configuration on dropping raw vectors from quantized formats after some period of time? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Can we add configuration on dropping raw vectors from quantized formats after some period of time? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Can we add configuration on dropping raw vectors from quantized formats after some period of time? [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Fix nightly test fail after adding custom_term_freq; fixes #15984 [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix nightly test fail after adding custom_term_freq; fixes #15984 [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Fix TestBlockPostingsFormat2 after adding custom_term_freq; fixes #15984 [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix TestBlockPostingsFormat2 after adding custom_term_freq; fixes #15984 [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene]
via GitHub
[I] TestBlockPostingsFormat2.testTTFBlockSize broken in branch_10x [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] TestBlockPostingsFormat2.testTTFBlockSize broken in branch_10x [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] TestBlockPostingsFormat2.testTTFBlockSize broken in branch_10x [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene]
via GitHub
[I] Improve clause ordering for multi-field DocValues range conjunctions [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Improve clause ordering for multi-field DocValues range conjunctions [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Improve clause ordering for multi-field DocValues range conjunctions [lucene]
via GitHub
Earlier messages
Later messages