issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Wrap dropped-FP scalar-quantized float values so scoring stays quantized [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Wrap dropped-FP scalar-quantized float values so scoring stays quantized [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] perf: optimize StateSet.equals to eliminate heap allocations during a… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize StateSet.equals to eliminate heap allocations during a… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize StateSet.equals to eliminate heap allocations during a… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize StateSet.equals to eliminate heap allocations during a… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize StateSet.equals to eliminate heap allocations during a… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize StateSet.equals to eliminate heap allocations during a… [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] ENH: Optimize StateSet.equals to avoid array allocation and sorting in Operations.determinize() [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump junit5 from 6.1.1 to 6.1.2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump junit5 from 6.1.1 to 6.1.2 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Improve comparator when search sort field does not exist [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve comparator when search sort field does not exist [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] GITHUB#12370: early-terminate string sort when field is missing from the whole index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#12370: early-terminate string sort when field is missing from the whole index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#12370: early-terminate string sort when field is missing from the whole index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#12370: early-terminate string sort when field is missing from the whole index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#12370: early-terminate string sort when field is missing from the whole index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#12370: early-terminate string sort when field is missing from the whole index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#12370: early-terminate string sort when field is missing from the whole index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#12370: early-terminate string sort when field is missing from the whole index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#12370: early-terminate string sort when field is missing from the whole index [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Correct Bayesian score fusion semantics and pruning [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct Bayesian score fusion semantics and pruning [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct Bayesian score fusion semantics and pruning [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Do not drop strictly competitive boundary candidates in filtered HNSW search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Do not drop strictly competitive boundary candidates in filtered HNSW search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Do not drop strictly competitive boundary candidates in filtered HNSW search [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestJoinUtil.testRandomOrdinalsJoin fails due to float precision in GlobalOrdinalsWithScoreCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestJoinUtil.testRandomOrdinalsJoin fails due to float precision in GlobalOrdinalsWithScoreCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestJoinUtil.testRandomOrdinalsJoin fails due to float precision in GlobalOrdinalsWithScoreCollector [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Binary search unequal-length suffixes in leaf term blocks. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary search unequal-length suffixes in leaf term blocks. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary search unequal-length suffixes in leaf term blocks. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary search unequal-length suffixes in leaf term blocks. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary search unequal-length suffixes in leaf term blocks. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix PointInSetQuery#ramBytesUsed to include retained bounds arrays [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix PointInSetQuery#ramBytesUsed to include retained bounds arrays [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix PointInSetQuery#ramBytesUsed to include retained bounds arrays [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix PointInSetQuery#ramBytesUsed to include retained bounds arrays [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] PointInSetQuery#ramBytesUsed under-reports memory: retained lowerPoint / upperPoint arrays not accounted for [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix MultiLeafKnnCollector global heap update bug [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix MultiLeafKnnCollector global heap update bug [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TopFieldCollector mistakenly assumes that all leaves share the same index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollector mistakenly assumes that all leaves share the same index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollector mistakenly assumes that all leaves share the same index sort [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field vectors formats [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] PathHierarchyTokenizer "ancestor search" use case broken in lucene >= 10.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] GITHUB#15769: Restore PathHierarchyTokenizer synonym positions for ancestor-path search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#15769: Restore PathHierarchyTokenizer synonym positions for ancestor-path search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#15769: Restore PathHierarchyTokenizer synonym positions for ancestor-path search [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Speed up TestHnswMergeAbort and make its assertion deterministic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up TestHnswMergeAbort and make its assertion deterministic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up TestHnswMergeAbort and make its assertion deterministic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up TestHnswMergeAbort and make its assertion deterministic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up TestHnswMergeAbort and make its assertion deterministic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up TestHnswMergeAbort and make its assertion deterministic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up TestHnswMergeAbort and make its assertion deterministic [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] HNSW graph reuse during merge is silently disabled under per-field codecs since 10.4.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] HNSW graph reuse during merge is silently disabled under per-field codecs since 10.4.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] HNSW graph reuse during merge is silently disabled under per-field codecs since 10.4.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Avoid redundant addresses.get() in sorted numeric rangeIntoBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid redundant addresses.get() in sorted numeric rangeIntoBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid redundant addresses.get() in sorted numeric rangeIntoBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] PR benchmark bot for Lucene? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] PR benchmark bot for Lucene? [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Test suite `TestHnswMergeAbort` slows down build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test suite `TestHnswMergeAbort` slows down build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test suite `TestHnswMergeAbort` slows down build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test suite `TestHnswMergeAbort` slows down build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test suite `TestHnswMergeAbort` slows down build [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Handle inconsistent schema on flush with index sorts (#15125) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Handle inconsistent schema on flush with index sorts (#15125) [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] Handle inconsistent schema on flush with index sorts (#15125) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Handle inconsistent schema on flush with index sorts (#15125) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Bulk nextDocsAndScores for constant-score disjunction clauses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk nextDocsAndScores for constant-score disjunction clauses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk nextDocsAndScores for constant-score disjunction clauses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk nextDocsAndScores for constant-score disjunction clauses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk nextDocsAndScores for constant-score disjunction clauses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk nextDocsAndScores for constant-score disjunction clauses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk nextDocsAndScores for constant-score disjunction clauses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk nextDocsAndScores for constant-score disjunction clauses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bulk nextDocsAndScores for constant-score disjunction clauses [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Move the GITHUB#16367 CHANGES entry to the 10.6.0 section [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move the GITHUB#16367 CHANGES entry to the 10.6.0 section [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Expose per-field on-disk byte-range layout from codec readers [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expose per-field on-disk byte-range layout from codec readers [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expose per-field on-disk byte-range layout from codec readers [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expose per-field on-disk byte-range layout from codec readers [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expose per-field on-disk byte-range layout from codec readers [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expose per-field on-disk byte-range layout from codec readers [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expose per-field on-disk byte-range layout from codec readers [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Check if merge is aborted during HNSW graph construction (#16368) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Check if merge is aborted during HNSW graph construction (#16368) [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] Check if merge is aborted during HNSW graph construction (#16368) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Check if merge is aborted during HNSW graph construction (#16368) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix double-counting of Automaton in AutomatonQuery#ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix double-counting of Automaton in AutomatonQuery#ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix double-counting of Automaton in AutomatonQuery#ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] AutomatonQuery#ramBytesUsed double-counts the underlying Automaton [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] AutomatonQuery#ramBytesUsed double-counts the underlying Automaton [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] AutomatonQuery#ramBytesUsed double-counts the underlying Automaton [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader.getDocValuesSkipper() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader.getDocValuesSkipper() [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Don't throw IOException from PointValues metadata methods [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't throw IOException from PointValues metadata methods [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't throw IOException from PointValues metadata methods [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't throw IOException from PointValues metadata methods [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix conflict in CHANGES.txt [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix conflict in CHANGES.txt [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix conflict in CHANGES.txt [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix conflict in CHANGES.txt [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix conflict in CHANGES.txt [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove unused public methods in AllGroupHeadsCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused public methods in AllGroupHeadsCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused public methods in AllGroupHeadsCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused public methods in AllGroupHeadsCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused public methods in AllGroupHeadsCollector [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Exception raised when using FixedShingleFilter with WordDelimiterGraphFilter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix FixedShingleFilter emitting a leading 0 position increment (GITHUB#14137) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix FixedShingleFilter emitting a leading 0 position increment (GITHUB#14137) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix FixedShingleFilter emitting a leading 0 position increment (GITHUB#14137) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Set minimum competitive score in FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Set minimum competitive score in FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Set minimum competitive score in FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Update code comment after bumping block size to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer overhead [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add optional query bit size hint to KnnSearchStrategy.Hnsw [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Use bulk scoring in NeighborArray#isWorstNonDiverse [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Store pre-aggregated sum and value count in DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fp16 (float16) vector encoding support - no quantization support [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Collapse repeated wildcard asterisks [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages