[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17158519#comment-17158519
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-9430:
---------------------------------------
There's no need for the additional boolean in constructor or isExplainable ().
Just add the fix for the explain method to make it give more details.
> Explainable ConstantScoreQuery
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9430
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9430
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jehyun Lee
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Developer cannot check the result of detailed explain with ConstantScoreQuery.
> If the developer want to check it, then must be change the query.
>
> The result is the same as ConstantScoreQuery,
> but if you can check the detailed explain, it will help in development and
> debug.
>
> So, I make the Pull Request for this :)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
