[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17187235#comment-17187235
]
Alexandre Rafalovitch commented on SOLR-13652:
----------------------------------------------
I think this is a great discussion. And maybe it needs to be bigger. We never
really reached even semi-consensus on learning schema vs. production schema (or
solrconfig.xml). In fact, from Jira review, I see people complaining that we
did completely opposite and ended up in a local minimum...
What would a bigger discussion look like? Another SIP?
> Remove update from initParams in example solrconfig files that only mention
> "df"
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-13652
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13652
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: examples
> Reporter: Erick Erickson
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: easyfix, newbie
>
> At least some of the solrconfig files we ship have this entry:
> <initParams
> path="/update/**,/query,/select,/tvrh,/elevate,/spell,/browse,update">
> <lst name="defaults">
> <str name="df">text</str>
> </lst>
> </initParams>
>
> which has lead at least one user to wonder if there's some kind of automatic
> way to have the df field populated for updates. I don't even know how you'd
> send an update that didn't have a specific field. We should remove the
> "update/**".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
