[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17216679#comment-17216679
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9318:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit 44c1bd42c577e32b29032c8fb4b7e64729d4623b in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/master from Tomoko Uchida
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=44c1bd4 ]
LUCENE-9318: Clean up package name conflicts for backward-codecs (#2000)
> Fix Codec API to not rely on package-private classes as part of changes to
> support java module system
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9318
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9318
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/other
> Affects Versions: master (9.0)
> Reporter: David Ryan
> Priority: Major
> Labels: build, features
> Time Spent: 1.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> To allow Lucene to be modularised with Java module system there are a few
> preparatory tasks to be completed prior to this being possible. These are
> detailed by Uwe on the mailing list here:
> [http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202004.mbox/%3c0a5e01d60ff2$563f9c80$02bed580$@thetaphi.de%3e]
>
> This task is:
> {quote}Fix Codec API to not rely on package-private classes, so we can have a
> completely public API with abstract classes for codecs, so stuff in
> backwards-codecs does not need to have access to package private stuff in
> core.
> {quote}
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
