[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17245421#comment-17245421
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-14987:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 8f769c6a82c6801a9c74b12131c1ac43ceb50827 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_8x from Timothy Potter
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=8f769c6 ]

SOLR-14987: Reuse HttpSolrClient per node vs. one per Solr core when using 
CloudSolrStream (#2128)



> SolrStream ends up creating a new HttpSolrClient for every replica being 
> queried instead of reusing for the same node
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-14987
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14987
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: streaming expressions
>            Reporter: Timothy Potter
>            Assignee: Timothy Potter
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 2h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Looking into some streaming expression performance issues when there are many 
> collections with many shards being queried and I found that SolrStream's open 
> method creates a new \{{HttpSolrClient}} for every replica being queried. For 
> instance, in my test case, I have 10 collections with 100 shards each (rf=1) 
> and I get 1000 HttpSolrClient instances in my SolrClientCache. If I reuse 
> HttpSolrClient's per node hosting a replica (so 10 in my case), the query 
> time for my expression drops by half (not too mention the reduced allocation 
> load on the JVM).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to