[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17321833#comment-17321833 ]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-9334: ------------------------------------------ I noticed a test failure from this commit (I haven't had the chance to dig in): {code} ./gradlew test --tests TestLucene50TermVectorsFormat.testMerge -Dtests.seed=C091C70F50381021 -Dtests.nightly=true -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=ml-IN -Dtests.timezone=America/Montevideo -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8 {code} > Require consistency between data-structures on a per-field basis > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-9334 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9334 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: main (9.0) > > Time Spent: 14.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Follow-up of > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r747de568afd7502008c45783b74cc3aeb31dab8aa60fcafaf65d5431%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E. > We would like to start requiring consitency across data-structures on a > per-field basis in order to make it easier to do the right thing by default: > range queries can run faster if doc values are enabled, sorted queries can > run faster if points by indexed, etc. > This would be a big change, so it should be rolled out in a major. > Strict validation is tricky to implement, but we should still implement > best-effort validation: > - Documents all use the same data-structures, e.g. it is illegal for a > document to only enable points and another document to only enable doc values, > - When possible, check whether values are consistent too. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org