[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17428846#comment-17428846 ]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10170: -------------------------------------- [~jpountz] maybe we should open an issue to add a simple stored fields benchmark to this thing. The last time I worked on a stored fields issue, I had to write my own because i wanted to avoid hassle and noise: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13022737/Indexer.java > Regression in stored fields compression in 9.0 > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-10170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10170 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Priority: Minor > Fix For: main (9.0) > > Time Spent: 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > One of the Elasticsearch benchmarks detected a regression that is attributed > to stored fields compression after moving to a 9.0 snapshot. I managed to > isolate it to the change done on LUCENE-7521. It looks like LZ4 relied > significantly on Direct16 for good performance, so replacing it with Packed64 > degraded compression speed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org