[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17430393#comment-17430393
 ] 

Jan Høydahl commented on LUCENE-10174:
--------------------------------------

When we skip "clean" step, the task does not need to re-compile, only to 
assemble the tar/zip and sign. I tested locally and {{--max-workers 8}} (my 
default) results in OOM, but {{--max-workers 4}} works fine. So I'll settle on 
{{--max-workers 2}} which on my laptop takes less than a minute, which should 
be acceptable for a release. The imporant thing to parallellize is the tests.

> Update buildAndPushRelease.py for new gradle build
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-10174
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10174
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>            Assignee: Jan Høydahl
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: main (9.0)
>
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> With LUCENE-9488 and LUCENE-10173 the gradle build was polished to properly 
> build source and binary artifacts, and sign those using either gpg tool or a 
> built-in java-based signing plugin. See 
> [https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/help/publishing.txt]
> This jira will update {{buildAndPushRelease.py}} script to use the correct 
> build parameters. It will also add cmdline args to choose between gpg and 
> built-in (gpg default), and to supply the location of {{gpgHome}} if you do 
> not use gpg. We'll also add an option to NOT prompt for passphrase in the 
> python script, which will fallback to defaults (gpg-agent, env.vars or 
> gradle.properties).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to