[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17431368#comment-17431368
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10189:
----------------------------------------------------------
Commit 3a11983de2df842c413cf159ccc5bdefcb721e33 in lucene's branch
refs/heads/main from Adrien Grand
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene.git;h=3a11983 ]
LUCENE-10189: Optimize flush of doc-value fields that are effectively
single-valued. (#399)
> Optimize SortedSet/SortedNumeric doc values writers for fields that are
> effectively single-valued
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10189
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10189
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I was wondering how much overhead multi-valued doc-value types have over
> their single-valued counterparts, so I hacked IndexTaxis to index all
> doc-value fields via Sorted(Set|Numeric)DocValuesField instead of
> (Sorted|Numeric)DocValuesField and flush times increased by 30%. It should be
> easy to automatically detect such cases in the doc values writers?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
