[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17469457#comment-17469457
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10354:
----------------------------------------------------------
Commit c8651afde70c62b4a4f5618b9483953bd2bc1bb8 in lucene's branch
refs/heads/main from Adrien Grand
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene.git;h=c8651af ]
LUCENE-10354: Clarify contract of codec APIs with missing/disabled fields.
(#583)
> Clarify contract of codec APIs with missing/disabled fields
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10354
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10354
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The question has come up a few times of how codec APIs should react to
> fields that are missing or do not have the relevant feature enabled.
> This issue proposes that we improve javadocs and AssertingCodec following the
> same model as doc values and norms:
> - The behavior of codec APIs on fields that are missing or don't have the
> feature enabled is undefined.
> - CodecReader is responsible for checking FieldInfos before delegating to
> codec APIs.
> - AssertingCodec ensures that we never call codec APIs on missing/disabled
> fields.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
