[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17472131#comment-17472131 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10283: ---------------------------------------------------------- Commit 2ebc57a465fc584cf2242765898290a6c2f0f420 in lucene's branch refs/heads/hnsw from Adrien Grand [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene.git;h=2ebc57a ] LUCENE-10283: Bump minimum required Java version to 17. (#579) Co-authored-by: Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@carrotsearch.com> > Bump minimum required Java version to 17 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-10283 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10283 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 10.0 (main) > > Time Spent: 7h 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > This is a follow-up of the discussion we had on > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zllbhw25sjvh3d4z4jt3x34qkyvdl2d1. > There's been discussions of whether we'd actually get more benefits than > downsides from moving to Java 17 but it looked to me like the idea of bumping > the minimum required Java version to 17 got traction in the end. > Some benefits that Robert mentioned in this thread: > - Absolute bulk get methods on ByteBuffers. > - New PRNGs. > - JFR runtime streaming API. > - Unix sockets for live stats? > - Bumped unicode version. > - HexFormat. > More info at https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/api/new-list.html. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org