[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17472131#comment-17472131
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10283:
----------------------------------------------------------
Commit 2ebc57a465fc584cf2242765898290a6c2f0f420 in lucene's branch
refs/heads/hnsw from Adrien Grand
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene.git;h=2ebc57a ]
LUCENE-10283: Bump minimum required Java version to 17. (#579)
Co-authored-by: Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@carrotsearch.com>
> Bump minimum required Java version to 17
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10283
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10283
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 10.0 (main)
>
> Time Spent: 7h 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> This is a follow-up of the discussion we had on
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/zllbhw25sjvh3d4z4jt3x34qkyvdl2d1.
> There's been discussions of whether we'd actually get more benefits than
> downsides from moving to Java 17 but it looked to me like the idea of bumping
> the minimum required Java version to 17 got traction in the end.
> Some benefits that Robert mentioned in this thread:
> - Absolute bulk get methods on ByteBuffers.
> - New PRNGs.
> - JFR runtime streaming API.
> - Unix sockets for live stats?
> - Bumped unicode version.
> - HexFormat.
> More info at https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/api/new-list.html.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
