gf2121 commented on pull request #597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/597#issuecomment-1011007555
Thanks @gsmiller @rmuir for helping dig!
I'm still thinking this degression comes from LUCENE-10350 because:
* LUCENE-10250 was working around SSDV not taxo facets.
* LUCENE-10356 was working around `#count` but did not touch the `#countAll`
logic, so it won't hurt `Browse*` tasks.
I'm still digging the reason but i can not reproduce it locally, so i plan
to revert it first since the degression it brings is larger than the
improvement.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
