gsmiller commented on pull request #597: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/597#issuecomment-1012217406
Interesting. It appears LUCENE-10372 was the cause of the regression in the nightly benchmarks (see most recent runs of the tasks mentioned [above](https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/597#issuecomment-1010061194)). I can't understand why this would be, or why @gf2121 and I would both see significant performance improvements associated with LUCENE-10372 when run on our machines while the nightly run would show a regression. I guess we've got some things to figure out here :). As a reminder, I've got LUCENE-10372 open to track this investigation, but for now, I suppose we ought to leave this change reverted. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
