[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17495336#comment-17495336
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10424:
----------------------------------------------------------
Commit ec4d20ac3c8dd7284600a1c742c731a685237644 in lucene's branch
refs/heads/branch_9x from Lu Xugang
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene.git;h=ec4d20a ]
LUCENE-10424: Optimize the "everything matches" case for count query in
PointRangeQuery (#691)
> Optimize the "everything matches" case for count query in PointRangeQuery
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10424
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10424
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 9.1
> Reporter: Lu Xugang
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In Implement of Weight#count in PointRangeQuery, Whether additional
> consideration is needed that when PointValues#getDocCount() ==
> IndexReader#maxDoc() and the range's lower bound is less that the field's min
> value and the range's upper bound is greater than the field's max value, then
> return reader.maxDoc() directly?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
