[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17499321#comment-17499321
 ] 

Michael Bien commented on LUCENE-10431:
---------------------------------------

IMO: If you don't want client code to use setters: deprecate them. Setters 
should either work or they shouldn't, it shouldn't depend implementation 
details like eager hashcode initialization and fail due to a certain query type 
in the tree.

I would also investigate the following: does the lazy hashcode logic make sense 
in context of the constructor essentially initializing it eagerly anyway?


The problem for the NetBeans module I am attempting to migrate is though: Some 
of the queries are not created by netbeans, as you can see in this code 
(https://github.com/apache/netbeans/blob/04fa8fba812566a211462fc3eef73597fbf3a975/java/maven.indexer/src/org/netbeans/modules/maven/indexer/NexusRepositoryIndexerImpl.java#L1389-L1457
 ), they are created by maven-indexer, a third party dependency.

So you could remove the setters but this would slow the lucene 5->8 migration 
down (for this particular part of NB at least, lucene is used in several 
places), since someone would have to try to update the API it in maven-indexer 
first, which would have to happen after its fixed in lucene. NB would be last 
in the chain.

> AssertionError in BooleanQuery.hashCode()
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-10431
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10431
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 8.11.1
>            Reporter: Michael Bien
>            Priority: Major
>
> Hello devs,
> the constructor of BooleanQuery can under some circumstances trigger a hash 
> code computation before "clauseSets" is fully filled. Since BooleanClause is 
> using its query field for the hash code too, it can happen that the "wrong" 
> hash code is stored, since adding the clause to the set triggers its 
> hashCode().
> If assertions are enabled the check in BooleanQuery, which recomputes the 
> hash code, will notice it and throw an error.
> exception:
> {code:java}
> java.lang.AssertionError
>     at org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery.hashCode(BooleanQuery.java:614)
>     at java.base/java.util.Objects.hashCode(Objects.java:103)
>     at java.base/java.util.HashMap$Node.hashCode(HashMap.java:298)
>     at java.base/java.util.AbstractMap.hashCode(AbstractMap.java:527)
>     at org.apache.lucene.search.Multiset.hashCode(Multiset.java:119)
>     at java.base/java.util.EnumMap.entryHashCode(EnumMap.java:717)
>     at java.base/java.util.EnumMap.hashCode(EnumMap.java:709)
>     at java.base/java.util.Arrays.hashCode(Arrays.java:4498)
>     at java.base/java.util.Objects.hash(Objects.java:133)
>     at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery.computeHashCode(BooleanQuery.java:597)
>     at org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery.hashCode(BooleanQuery.java:611)
>     at java.base/java.util.HashMap.hash(HashMap.java:340)
>     at java.base/java.util.HashMap.put(HashMap.java:612)
>     at org.apache.lucene.search.Multiset.add(Multiset.java:82)
>     at org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery.<init>(BooleanQuery.java:154)
>     at org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery.<init>(BooleanQuery.java:42)
>     at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery$Builder.build(BooleanQuery.java:133)
> {code}
> I noticed this while trying to upgrade the NetBeans maven indexer modules 
> from lucene 5.x to 8.x https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/3558



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to