iverase commented on a change in pull request #736:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/736#discussion_r827815011
##########
File path:
lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/sandbox/search/IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery.java
##########
@@ -278,7 +287,21 @@ private BoundedDocSetIdIterator getDocIdSetIterator(
}
int lastDocIdExclusive = high + 1;
- return new BoundedDocSetIdIterator(firstDocIdInclusive,
lastDocIdExclusive, delegate);
+ Object missingValue = sortField.getMissingValue();
+ BoundedDocIdSetIterator disi;
+ LeafReader reader = context.reader();
+ PointValues pointValues = reader.getPointValues(field);
+ final long missingLongValue = missingValue == null ? 0L : (long)
missingValue;
+ if (reader.hasDeletions() == false
+ && pointValues != null
+ && pointValues.getDocCount() == reader.maxDoc()
+ || missingLongValue < lowerValue
+ || missingLongValue > upperValue) {
Review comment:
This if condition is extremely difficult to read, I wonder if we should
add some parenthesis or rewrite it somehow to make it clear
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
