[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17508589#comment-17508589
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10473:
--------------------------------------
Maybe we can mark them monster tests or something? Are these really crucial to
verifying correctness of these implementations?
> Address slow testRandomBig runs
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10473
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10473
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Julie Tibshirani
> Priority: Major
>
> While working on the 9.1 release, we noticed the smoke tester sometimes
> taking several hours. It looks like some tests can take a really long time,
> especially when a higher "tests.multiplier" is used (than the default of 1):
> {code:java}
> The slowest tests (exceeding 500 ms) during this run:
> 3298.44s TestDoubleRangeFieldQueries.testRandomBig (:lucene:core)
> 2869.82s Test2BPostings.test (:lucene:core)
> 1951.74s TestLatLonDocValuesQueries.testRandomBig (:lucene:core)
> 1628.04s TestLatLonPointQueries.testRandomBig (:lucene:core)
> 1492.32s TestGeo3DPoint.testRandomBig (:lucene:spatial3d)
> 1481.19s TestXYDocValuesQueries.testRandomBig (:lucene:core)
> 1351.95s TestXYPointQueries.testRandomBig (:lucene:core)
> 940.30s TestLongRangeFieldQueries.testRandomBig (:lucene:core)
> 871.50s Test4GBStoredFields.test (:lucene:core)
> 743.00s TestFloatRangeFieldQueries.testRandomBig (:lucene:core)
> {code}
> -The main offender looks like {{{}BaseSpatialTestCase#testRandomBig{}}}, we
> should look into making this run faster.-
> Maybe relates to LUCENE-8643?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
