[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17545246#comment-17545246
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10578:
----------------------------------------
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/Runtime.Version.html
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/Runtime.Version.html
For both Java 11 and 17, Runtime.Version.feature() / interim() / update() are
available.
> Make minimum required Java version for build more specific
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10578
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10578
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tomoko Uchida
> Priority: Minor
>
> See this mail thread for background:
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread/6md5k94pqdkkwg0f66hor2sonm2t77jo]
> To prevent developers (especially, release managers) from using too old java
> versions, we could (should?) elaborate the minimum required java versions for
> the build.
> Possible questions in my mind:
> * should we stop the build with an error or emit a warning and continue?
> * do minor versions depend on the vendor? if yes, should we also specify the
> vendor?
> * how do we determine/maintain the minimum version?
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
