[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17552534#comment-17552534
]
Lu Xugang commented on LUCENE-10603:
------------------------------------
Hi, [~gsmiller] , my initial thought was just wanna to keep code consistency
between SortedSetDocValues and SortedNumericDocValues because their logic of
multi-values iteration were so similar, it is just a spotless change.
{quote}we think the loops can be better optimized by the JVM/hotspot since the
number of iterations is known ahead of time{quote}
Sorry for that I am not good at JVM and not sure whether this change could be
optimized
> Improve iteration of ords for SortedSetDocValues
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10603
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Lu Xugang
> Priority: Trivial
>
> After SortedSetDocValues#docValueCount added since Lucene 9.2, should we
> refactor the implementation of ords iterations using docValueCount instead of
> NO_MORE_ORDS?
> Similar how SortedNumericDocValues did
> From
> {code:java}
> for (long ord = values.nextOrd();ord != SortedSetDocValues.NO_MORE_ORDS; ord
> = values.nextOrd()) {
> }{code}
> to
> {code:java}
> for (int i = 0; i < values.docValueCount(); i++) {
> long ord = values.nextOrd();
> }{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
