boicehuang commented on code in PR #13306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13306#discussion_r1581809438


##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/LRUQueryCache.java:
##########
@@ -265,7 +269,6 @@ boolean requiresEviction() {
   }
 
   CacheAndCount get(Query key, IndexReader.CacheHelper cacheHelper) {
-    assert lock.isHeldByCurrentThread();
     assert key instanceof BoostQuery == false;
     assert key instanceof ConstantScoreQuery == false;
     final IndexReader.CacheKey readerKey = cacheHelper.getKey();

Review Comment:
   In my optimization, the writing to `cache` object  was still  protected via 
the write lock,  but reading `cache` object can be a concurrent action via 
making `cache` object to be `ConcurrentHashMap`. This is the key point of my 
optimization. I am also trying to read through all the concurrency paths.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to