[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-3?page=comments#action_60889 ] 

Vincent Siveton commented on MJAVADOC-3:
----------------------------------------

I think a better approach could be to use user system settings defined by 
maven-settings. WDYT?


> plugin should honor proxy settings
> ----------------------------------
>
>          Key: MJAVADOC-3
>          URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-3
>      Project: Maven 2.x Javadoc Plugin
>         Type: Bug

>  Environment: tested on Linux/Windows
>     Reporter: Dirk Olmes
>     Assignee: Maria Odea Ching
>     Priority: Minor
>      Fix For: 2.0-beta-4
>  Attachments: MJAVADOC-3-maven-javadoc-plugin.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 3 hours, 30 minutes
>        Time Spent: 3 hours, 30 minutes
>         Remaining: 0 minutes
>
> The maven2 plugin should honor the proxy settings. When specifying the <link> 
> option, the forked javadoc process always tries to fetch the package-list 
> directly. This fails on corporate networks, where all web access has to go 
> through a proxy.
> I've tried to specify a proxy by using the <additionalparam> option but this 
> does not work because all parameters for the javadoc process are written to 
> an options file, which is passed to the forked javadoc process. By the time 
> the javadoc process gets to see the arguments, it is already running so all 
> VM parameters (-J-Dhttp.proxyHost...) cause errors.
> The most seamless integration would be to pass whatever proxy is configured 
> to the forked javadoc process. Configuration options for specifying the proxy 
> for the javadoc-plugin would be acceptable, too.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to