issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.maven:maven-parent from 45 to 47 [maven-dist-tool] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.maven:maven-parent from 45 to 47 [maven-dist-tool] via GitHub
• [PR] Update to 47 [maven-dist-tool] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to 47 [maven-dist-tool] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to 47 [maven-dist-tool] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugins from 45 to 47 [maven-assembly-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugins from 45 to 47 [maven-assembly-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugins from 45 to 47 [maven-assembly-plugin] via GitHub
• [PR] Update to Parent 47 [maven-assembly-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to Parent 47 [maven-assembly-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to Parent 47 [maven-assembly-plugin] via GitHub
• [I] <type>processor</type> does not pick up annotation processor [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] <type>processor</type> does not pick up annotation processor [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
• [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate JUnit 3,4 and TestNG providers [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add Test Start Timestamp to Surefire XML Reports [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add Test Start Timestamp to Surefire XML Reports [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add Test Start Timestamp to Surefire XML Reports [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• [I] Height property in <img/> tags are translated to a CSS style attribute without a `px` suffix [maven-site-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Height property in <img/> tags are translated to a CSS style attribute without a `px` suffix [maven-site-plugin] via GitHub
• [I] Permissions are not changed correctly when site is not deployed relative to its parent [maven-site-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Permissions are not changed correctly when site is not deployed relative to its parent [maven-site-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Permissions are not changed correctly when site is not deployed relative to its parent [maven-site-plugin] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Build fails with Maven 4.0.0-rc5 [maven-xinclude-extension] via GitHub
• [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix for issue #450 - fixed CacheUtils.unzip to properly restore unix permissions on file systems that support it [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Reorder cases to avoid skipping [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reorder cases to avoid skipping [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
• [PR] Javadoc fixes [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Javadoc fixes [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Javadoc fixes [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [MCOMPILER-1006] Fix <proc>only</proc> not triggering annotation processors [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [MCOMPILER-1006] Fix <proc>only</proc> not triggering annotation processors [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [MCOMPILER-1006] Fix <proc>only</proc> not triggering annotation processors [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Document deprecation of Language.SCRIPT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Document deprecation of Language.SCRIPT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Document deprecation of Language.SCRIPT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Document deprecation of Language.SCRIPT [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub

• Later messages