[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-42?page=comments#action_63255 ] 

Brett Porter commented on MPIR-42:
----------------------------------

I'm not sure of the issue. If you can't find it, feel free to file a new one. 
In the end it will get linked up or resolved.

To change the second element in the URL, you can set <checkoutDirectoryName> in 
the plugin configuration.

> use of POM artifactId for svn report creates issues when file layout doesn't 
> match artifact names
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: MPIR-42
>          URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-42
>      Project: Maven 2.x Project Info Reports Plugin
>         Type: Bug

>     Reporter: Jerome Lacoste
>     Assignee: Brett Porter
>     Priority: Critical

>
>
> See 
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/webstart-maven-plugin-parent/webstart-maven-plugin/source-repository.html
> The webstart project is a multiproject plugin with the following layout:
> webstart-maven-plugin/pom.xml  (artifactid = webstart-maven-plugin-parent)
> webstart-maven-plugin/plugin/pom.xml (artifactid = webstart-maven-plugin)
> the ScmReport uses the artifactid and a URL built using the artifactIds to 
> construct the scm report information. E.g. :
>         private void anonymousAccessSVN( SvnScmProviderRepository svnRepo )
>         {
>             paragraph( i18n.getString( "project-info-report", locale, 
> "report.scm.anonymousaccess.svn.intro" ) );
>             StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
>             sb.append( "$ svn checkout " ).append( svnRepo.getUrl() ).append( 
> " " ).append( model.getArtifactId() );
>             verbatimText( sb.toString() );
>         }
> All generated svn information (web, svn command line) is then wrong.
> Instead of 
> https://svn.mojo.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/mojo-sandbox/webstart-maven-plugin-parent/webstart-maven-plugin
> one should have:
> https://svn.mojo.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/mojo-sandbox/webstart-maven-plugin/plugin
> Etc...
> Should I really override all my pom.xml <scm> entries, or should the plugin 
> be smarter and use the file layout instead?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to