[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAR-38?page=comments#action_66580 ] 

Stephane Nicoll commented on MJAR-38:
-------------------------------------

Mike,

Could you please make sure the fix is backported to other plugins generating a 
MANIFEST entry (Jar, War, Ejb, Ear I guess).

Thanks!

> Maven Puts Arbitrary Extension Definition in JAR Manifest by Default.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: MJAR-38
>          URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAR-38
>      Project: Maven 2.x Jar Plugin
>         Type: Bug

>     Versions: 2.0
>  Environment: Maven version: 2.0.4
> Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
>     Reporter: Steven Coco
>     Assignee: Mike Perham
>  Attachments: Jar Extension-Name Tester.zip, MavenArchiver.patch.1, 
> MavenArchiver.patch.1, MavenArchiver.patch.2, MavenArchiver.patch.3
>
>
>     I'm using the latest Maven release.  When I build my project, the 
> resulting Jar file's manifest contains an Extension-Name attribute along with 
> Specification and Implementation attributes.  The POM contains no mention 
> that this project is a Java optional package -- an "extension" (or an 
> extension of any other kind).
>     I don't know why Maven is doing that.
>     If Maven is doing this by default for some reason, it absolutely 
> shouldn't.  Maven should not identify my Jar as an optional package unless I 
> explicitly say so.  Jars are only extensions if explicitly created as such.
>      The name it uses for the extension name is the POM's <artifactId>.  
> That's not even a UID!

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to