[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15152381#comment-15152381
]
Arnaud HERITIER commented on MNG-5971:
--------------------------------------
I agree that the import scope which add depMgt entries which cannot be
redefined was always a nightmare especially nowdays where BOMs are often used
and thus you can override a part of the depMgt with a BOM if the entries were
already defined in another one.
Changing the behavior is difficult, but I'm not sure if it isn't better than an
new scope which will be difficult to explain: import vs include
> Imported dependencies should be available to inheritance processing
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-5971
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5971
> Project: Maven
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Dependencies
> Affects Versions: 3.3.3
> Reporter: Stephane Nicoll
> Priority: Trivial
>
> When a project extends from a parent with a {{dependencyManagement}} section,
> it is not always possible to properly override (and align) the version to use
> for a group of dependencies.
> We typically use Bill Of Materials to gather a group of modules and make sure
> their versions are consistent.
> The following project demonstrates the issue:
> https://github.com/snicoll-scratches/maven-dependency-management
> The first commit is a working use case where the parent uses a bom with
> version A and we use the same bom with version B in the child. Version B is
> used as expected.
> The second commit demonstrates the faulty scenario. Rather than using a bom
> in the parent, we use a direct dependency (provided by that bom). We still
> use the bom with a different version. In that case all the dependencies but
> the one provided by the parent are overridden (leading to mixed versions for
> the dependencies provided by the BOM).
> It looks like the distance is still used to compute the version while the
> graph of dependencies should be flatten at each step for a proper override.
> Thoughts? Thanks!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
