[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16861419#comment-16861419
]
Michael Osipov commented on MNG-6677:
-------------------------------------
Yes, I was referring to MPIR-382. The problem is with the list of licenses also
that some people write two licenses in the name element because it is so. So is
Tomcat, for example. How do you want to cover that? IT would require a unique
license ID. Please make a proposal how you would like the next POM version look
like.
What we could do is to add the license id optionally to the manifest or the
properties bundled the archiver, but that you can already do on your own.
> Ability to declare machine-readable license identifier for project
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-6677
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6677
> Project: Maven
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: POM
> Affects Versions: 3.6.1
> Reporter: Vladimir Sitnikov
> Priority: Major
>
> Current model for license is something, yet it is not machine-friendly.
> Developers tend to put random data into
> {{<license><name>...</name><url>...</url>}}, and it is hard to analyze in
> automatic way.
> What if we could use SPDX license identifiers/expressions for license
> information?
> Note: currently POM allows to list multiple <license> tags, and it is not
> clear how they should be treated (and? or?). So a machine-readable field
> should probably allow for AND/OR license expressions.
> So it would be nice if there was a way to declare a machine-readable license
> tag.
> I'm not affiliated with SPDX, however OSGi use those ids:
> https://osgi.org/specification/osgi.core/7.0.0/framework.module.html#framework.module-bundle-license
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
