[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17148100#comment-17148100
]
Michael Osipov commented on MRESOLVER-123:
------------------------------------------
Branch MRESOLVER-123 provide a naive solutin to this problem by utilizing a
{{ReentrantReadWriteLock}} which will bascially avoid concurrent writes to the
same local repository. This solution is *not* suited for concurrent access from
multiple Maven instances. It is still open, if this works, to be the default
solution or an extension to be installed separately.
> Concurrency issues
> ------------------
>
> Key: MRESOLVER-123
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-123
> Project: Maven Resolver
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: resolver
> Affects Versions: 1.4.2
> Reporter: Michael Osipov
> Priority: Critical
>
> This is an umbrella ticket for a long standing issue with Maven Resolver: Our
> concurrency support is mediocre in a way that if two or more threads try to
> download the same file and fail to queue those write actions nicely. The
> problem is that The {{SyncContext}} and the its factory provided by Maven
> Resolver does not employ any locking at all. As layed out in detail in
> MRESOLVER-114 we need striped read write locks on artifacts and its metadata.
> This issue shall track progress on it. Even Takari Concurrent Repository
> extension does not help because it is only intended to synchronize concurrent
> access by multple JVMs and not threads.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
