bmarwell commented on pull request #23: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-jlink-plugin/pull/23#issuecomment-740549053
> Isnt it better to use the class logger like before rather than a static one which looses the context when logging the class name for these cases? > Also not sure it is worth using slf4j first and put it at plugin level, we use maven one so it should be provided anyway. We came up with this Issue and PR because Elliotte suggested to use slf4j. I think he refers to this page: https://maven.apache.org/maven-logging.html Is this still valid? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
