[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17270901#comment-17270901
]
Krosheninnikov Artem commented on MENFORCER-376:
------------------------------------------------
There are several questions:
1) It should not be possible to define one vendor both in includes and
excludes, right?
2) If vendor name is not from includes but it's also not in excludes, what
should happen?
[~MattNelson], [~jbennett2091], WDYT?
> Add support for excludes/includes in requireJavaVendor rule
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MENFORCER-376
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-376
> Project: Maven Enforcer Plugin
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Standard Rules
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-M3
> Reporter: Krosheninnikov Artem
> Priority: Major
>
> There was a suggestion here [1] to add includes/excludes support in
> requireJavaVendor rule. Right now it's not clear how it would work if you
> define the same vendor name in exclude and include lists but implementation
> can be more or less copied from BannedDependencies rule.
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-338?focusedCommentId=17169044&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17169044
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
