[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_89074
]
Wendy Smoak commented on MASSEMBLY-169:
---------------------------------------
The different version numbers for artifacts vs. models are already a fact of
life. For example, Maven 2.0.x uses maven-model 4.0.x.
IMO we need a visual marker that something is "different", and then to explain
how to interpret the information. I remain convinced that users will adapt to
it, and that it's better than the confusion we have now.
+1 to go ahead with the changes in modello-maven-plugin and start using this.
> Document new elements in the assembly descriptor as "Since 2.2"
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MASSEMBLY-169
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-169
> Project: Maven 2.x Assembly Plugin
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.2
> Reporter: Wendy Smoak
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.2
>
> Attachments: assembly-since-2.2.patch
>
>
> The assembly.html page includes elements introduced after the 2.1 release.
> These need to be documented as "Since 2.2" to avoid confusion.
> (Another option would be for modello:xdoc to generate something based on the
> <version> in the model.)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
