[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Venisse updated SCM-227:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: future
> Document use cases for maven-scm-plugin
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: SCM-227
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-227
> Project: Maven SCM
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: maven-plugin
> Affects Versions: 1.0-beta-3
> Reporter: Yuri Schimke
> Fix For: future
>
>
> I'm creating a new issue, instead of opening SCM-221 because its really a
> broader issue.
> We are using perforce, but I am not putting this against it, because I hope
> it will work consistently across all providers.
> Its confusing exactly which scenarios are supported by the maven plugin. It
> seems to work great with the release plugin, but using the scm plugin
> directly is not straightforward.
> There is probably only a handful of reasons people will be using the scm
> plugin directly, rather than part of something like the release plugin, these
> include.
> 1) scm:update or scm:status - to sync or check an existing checkout against
> HEAD or label. i.e. cruisecontrol.
> - in perforce this would use an existing clientspec.
> 2) scm:checkout - to get a new working directory that then supports
> scm:status, scm:update etc
> - in perforce this would be a new persistent clientspec.
> 3) export files from source control e.g. "cvs export",
> - in perforce this would be a new temporary clientspec.
> In terms of the direction of the project, the use of system properties seems
> a bit brittle as these providers might be used multiple times within a mvn
> build. i.e. the release plugin, checks the local status 1), then does a
> clean checkout 3). Although I guess the release plugin might just set these
> option in code anyway, ignoring the system property.
> Examples of the problems we are having, scm:checkout works well, but then
> trying to use scm:update gives you wrong results. Without the page showing
> the typical use cases of the scm plugin (regardless of SCM provider), its
> hard to work out if something is a bug or just not supported.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
