[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17631324#comment-17631324 ]
Michael Osipov commented on MNG-7595: ------------------------------------- What a pain :-( > [REGRESSION] $pom.-expressions in remote pom cause warnings > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MNG-7595 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7595 > Project: Maven > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 4.0.0-alpha-2 > Reporter: Robert Scholte > Priority: Major > > When depending on > [wagon-http-1.0-beta-6|https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/wagon/wagon-http/1.0-beta-6/wagon-http-1.0-beta-6.pom] > you'll get a warning like: > {noformat} > [WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:jar:1.0-beta-6 is > invalid, transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available: 1 problem > was encountered while building the effective model for > C:\Users\rober\.m2\repository\org\apache\maven\wagon\wagon-http\1.0-beta-6\wagon-http-1.0-beta-6.pom > [ERROR] 'dependencies.dependency.groupId' for > ${pom.groupId}:wagon-http-shared:jar with value '${pom.groupId}' does not > match a valid coordinate id pattern. @ > org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:1.0-beta-6 > {noformat} > Even though this is an old artifact, IMO we should not have such a warning > for remote poms, as they cannot be changed. So the question is: do we need to > reconsider the decision to only allow $project.-expressions for the build-pom? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)