[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tamas Cservenak closed MRESOLVER-377.
-------------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> Introduce metadata update policy
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MRESOLVER-377
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-377
>             Project: Maven Resolver
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Resolver
>            Reporter: Tamas Cservenak
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Split the policies applied in case of data and metadata, allowing greater 
> control of their updates. Still, work "as before" in case of applications 
> that migrate from 1.x resolver (they should receive no behavior change).
> The crux of this change is really just to introduce two policies (to co-exist 
> in parallel), but if application using resolver decides to use same policy 
> for both, the original behavior of resolver returns and will seemingly behave 
> as before (ie. like 1.9.x does).
> Maven relies on metadata in these cases ONLY:
> * resolving maven plugin prefix to maven plugin groupId (G level md)
> * resolving snapshot version to timestamped version (V level md)
> Resolver OTOH provides one more use case:
> * "discovery" of existing versions for given GA (this use case is NOT used in 
> Maven Core) (A level md)
> Now, while Maven Core itself does NOT use 3rd use case, some plugins does, 
> most notably the versions-maven-plugin. Today, everyone on Earth use this 
> plugin along with `-U` Maven switch to pick up new stuff from remote 
> repository, but this is total overkill, as it refreshes _everything_ (yes, 
> even the immutable release artifacts!). The `-U` is simply a "must", to make 
> Maven "refresh metadata" (as well, along with all the Artifacts) to pick up 
> new versions on remote. Versions plugin did implement a ["hack" to overcome 
> this 
> limitation](https://github.com/mojohaus/versions/commit/82e2450d8bbd22c3f8cdc06d44c44d618c69e23e),
>  that is still a hack, as it still applies to everything. Proper solution is 
> to have means to express `-U but for metadata only`. This PR makes this 
> possible on resolver side.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to