[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17787033#comment-17787033
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MRESOLVER-372:
------------------------------------------

laeubi commented on PR #364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/364#issuecomment-1815784844

   @cstamas I'm a bit late to the party **but** as @rdicroce already tested 
showed I cna only tell that Maven 3.8.x ("old"? resolver) has worked under 
Windows why upgrade to 3.9.x ("new"? resolver) shows reproducible problems in 
this regard.
   
   I'm not a windows expert enough to tell but think @olamy  has done already 
some analysis in the past about the Move/Sync problem.
   
   In general I think it would really be beneficial if resolver would simply 
use time-stamped SNAPSHOTs instead of "normalized", maybe one can even for a 
while simply **write** the SNAPSHOT as an additional file (on windows) and  
**symlink** under Linux but resolver use/returns the timestamped file to start 
a migration?




> Download fails if file is currently in use under windows
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MRESOLVER-372
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-372
>             Project: Maven Resolver
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Resolver
>            Reporter: Christoph Läubrich
>            Assignee: Tamas Cservenak
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.9.17
>
>
> With the new file-locking in maven-resolver there is a problem under windows 
> if the file is currently used by another process (this can for example happen 
> in an IDE ...) and resolver likes to move the file:
>  
> {code:java}
>  Caused by: java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
> xxx-SNAPSHOT.jar.15463549870494779429.tmp -> xxxx-SNAPSHOT.jar
>         at 
> java.base/sun.nio.fs.WindowsException.translateToIOException(WindowsException.java:89)
>         at 
> java.base/sun.nio.fs.WindowsException.rethrowAsIOException(WindowsException.java:103)
>         at java.base/sun.nio.fs.WindowsFileCopy.move(WindowsFileCopy.java:317)
>         at 
> java.base/sun.nio.fs.WindowsFileSystemProvider.move(WindowsFileSystemProvider.java:293)
>         at java.base/java.nio.file.Files.move(Files.java:1432)
>         at org.eclipse.aether.util.FileUtils$2.move(FileUtils.java:108)
>         at 
> org.eclipse.aether.internal.impl.DefaultFileProcessor.copy(DefaultFileProcessor.java:96)
>         at 
> org.eclipse.aether.internal.impl.DefaultFileProcessor.copy(DefaultFileProcessor.java:88)
>         at 
> org.eclipse.aether.internal.impl.DefaultArtifactResolver.getFile(DefaultArtifactResolver.java:490)
>         ... 30 more{code}
>  
> My suggestion would be that resolver simply uses the temp file if it can't be 
> moved to final location and marks it as delete on exit. Even though this is 
> not optimal, it at least ensures the the build does not fail to the cost that 
> next time the file needs to be downloaded again.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to